1分快3APP - 360百科
1分快3官网网址2023-01-31 16:05

剪纸馆盈满中国红 烟台非遗人巧手片纸展宏“兔”******

  (新春走基层)剪纸馆盈满中国红 烟台非遗人巧手片纸展宏“兔”

  中新网烟台2月3日电 题:剪纸馆盈满中国红 烟台非遗人巧手片纸展宏“兔”

  记者 王娇妮

  当非遗剪纸遇上癸卯年,国家级非物质文化遗产——烟台剪纸项目代表性传承人梁巧艳比往年更忙了。把小剪纸从装饰品变成大产业,用剪纸的语言讲述中国故事,是她的新年目标。

  走进位于烟台所城历史文化街区的剪纸馆,“中国红”扑面而来。窗户上贴着红红的窗花,大人小孩围坐桌前剪图样。墙上、架子上展示着不同风格、不同题材的剪纸作品、文创产品,用“一抹红”向来到馆里的海内外游客传递中国年味儿。

图为梁巧艳在剪窗花。 王娇妮 摄图为梁巧艳在剪窗花。 王娇妮 摄

  据悉,烟台剪纸历史悠久,样式品类丰富。其中“单色、勾绘染色、衬色、拼色”等技法呈现出浓厚的生活情趣,2008年入选国家级非物质文化遗产名录。

  “小时候,窗花里的故事令我着迷,每看到不同图案的剪纸就缠着奶奶给我讲故事,‘刘海戏金蟾’‘八仙过海’之类的传说都通过窗花纹样走进我的脑海。”梁巧艳告诉记者,她出生于剪纸世家,5岁开始画窗花、学剪纸,与剪纸有着解不开的缘分。

图为梁巧艳创作的剪纸作品《芝罘仙境》。 受访者供图图为梁巧艳创作的剪纸作品《芝罘仙境》。 受访者供图

  长大后,梁巧艳不断钻研技艺,挖掘当地题材,拜访国内外名家,并在创新中积累经验。“一刀一纸”不足以概括剪纸,在她看来,最重要的还是“故事性”,要能够“纸中生意”“纸中传情”。

  近年来,梁巧艳聚焦身边带有正能量的人和事,以纸为媒讲故事,在烟台城市发展、乡村振兴、国之重器等题材上,不断推出优秀作品。

图为剪纸衍生品。 王娇妮 摄图为剪纸衍生品。 王娇妮 摄

  “耗时最多,也最有意义的作品是胶东红色文化主题创作。当时我跟随专家一起重温胶东革命历程,创作出百余幅剪纸,以此传承红色基因,同时希望向人们传达要珍惜现在幸福生活的涵义。”梁巧艳称。

  剪纸不仅能贴在窗上,还能“解锁”更多场景。当剪纸与生活用品、办公文具甚至是网络游戏相结合时,又开发出大量符合年轻人审美的新产品。如今,梁巧艳的剪纸工作室不断发展壮大,订单越来越多。

图为梁巧艳在介绍烟台剪纸。 王娇妮 摄图为梁巧艳在介绍烟台剪纸。 王娇妮 摄

  “不少企业找到我,希望私人订制剪纸产品,作为礼物送给海外客户。”梁巧艳称,这些礼物将中国非遗与中国企业发展相结合,在“出海”的同时,也把中国故事越传越远。

  随着网络直播的流行,梁巧艳把剪纸课堂从学校、社区搬进了直播间。在年前开设的一场双语角网络课堂上,许多泰国、俄罗斯学生通过直播学剪纸,在“现场教、现场剪”的云端,中外师生共同经历剪纸带来的美好时刻。

  “作为非遗人,不应该排斥新事物,而应该不断拓展传播渠道。”梁巧艳告诉记者,只有不断壮大产业,才能促进更多的剪纸艺人创作出好作品,巧手片纸间,也能大展宏“兔”。(完)

1分快3APP

中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

  中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。

  2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

  日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

  日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

  事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。

  因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。

  日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

  《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

  德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

  日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

  国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。

  太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。

  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

  By John Lee

  (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

  Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

  The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

  On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

  The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

  In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

  Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

  The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

  The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

  The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

  According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

  As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

  However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

  Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

  The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

  If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.

 

                                                                                                                                                              • 中国网客户端

                                                                                                                                                                国家重点新闻网站,9语种权威发布

                                                                                                                                                                1分快3地图